How It Works

From question to decision in one seamless process.

STEP 01

You Ask

Submit your question in plain language. No forms, no dashboards, no jargon required. Just describe what you need to know.

Examples: "Should I increase exposure to clean energy ahead of the infrastructure vote?" or "What's the smart money doing with NVDA before earnings?" or "Is the prediction market pricing in a rate cut?"

STEP 02

We Mobilize

Eight independent departments analyze simultaneously. Research, options, macro, crypto, politica, compliance — all working in parallel on your question.

Research examines fundamentals and valuation. Options Desk models risk-reward structures. Macro analyzes central bank policy and geopolitical context. Crypto monitors on-chain signals. Politica tracks congressional trading patterns. The Library provides long-term historical perspective. Black Swan Room stress-tests for tail risks. Compliance screens for regulatory exposure.

STEP 03

They Debate

Five senior committee members review all analysis. They argue, challenge, and stress-test every angle. Compliance holds veto power over any recommendation.

Each member votes independently: FOR, AGAINST, or VETO. A minimum of 3 out of 5 FOR votes is required to proceed. A single VETO from Compliance overrides any majority. The debate is recorded and archived for the 30-day post-mortem review.

STEP 04

You Decide

You receive one clear recommendation with arguments for and against. GO, NO, or WAIT. The final call is always yours.

The 30-Day Post-Mortem

Every recommendation we issue enters a 30-day accountability cycle. After one month, our internal review board assesses the outcome against the original thesis.

Did the signal materialize? Was the timing accurate? Did the committee identify the right risk factors? Every department involved receives a performance score. These scores are cumulative and permanent.

This is not a formality. Post-mortem results directly influence future committee weighting. Departments with higher accuracy earn greater influence in subsequent votes. Those with declining accuracy are flagged for methodology review.

We grade ourselves harder than you ever would.